Real Racial Violence, Phony Racial Propaganda

Can’t you see the headlines?   89-Year-Old African American Wounded World War II Veteran of Battle of Okinawa Viciously Beaten to Death by Two White Youths.  'Bored' White Oklahoma Teens Randomly Kill 22-Year-Old Black College Student.

Can’t you hear the outrage?  Burn, baby burn.   America decried as a violent, racist society where African Americans are targeted for discrimination, degradation, and death.   Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton call for a Million Man March to make the streets safe for “black folks.”  ABC interviews Barack Hussein Obama who suggests that he could have been that student and the veteran could have been his father.

But, as usual, the victims were white.  Commenting on surveillance photos, Spokane, Washington television station KHQ reported on August 22, 2013 that the two black alleged murderers of eighty-nine-year old Delbert Belton “are believed to be between 16 to 19 years old and were wearing black clothes, while one suspect was seen wearing a black ‘do-rag’.”  The article explained that Belton's daughter-in-law said that the elderly gentleman “was hit with ‘big heavy flashlights’ and doctors told her he was bleeding from all parts of his face.”  The police called Belton’s murder, “a random attack.” 

Chris Lane, a 22-year-old Oklahoma college baseball player, was shot in the back as he jogged along the street.   In April, the alleged shooter, black 15-year-old James Edwards, had tweeted, "90% of white ppl (people) are nasty. #HATE THEM," and "With my niggers when it's time to start taken life's;" procuring the line from a rap song by Chief Keef called, I Don't Like: 

Fake Trues that's that shit I don't like

Fake shoes, that's that shit I don't like

Fake niggas, that's that shit I don't like

Stalking ass bitch, shit I don't like

I done got indicted selling all white

But I won't never snitch none in my life

I keep this shit 3hunna bitch, I'm going right

With my niggas when it's time to start taking lifes

Playing both sides, shit that I don't like

Wartime spark broad day, all night

Playing both sides, shit that I don't like

Wartime spark broad day, all night

“Entertainment” media is so accepting of black-on-white violence that Edwards could have gotten his inspiration from “visual arts” as well as from rap music.  For instance, Jamie Foxx played to a rousing, giggling, howling crowd as he hosted Saturday Night live when promoting his film, Django.  On the occasion, he boasted that his clothes were entirely black.  Repeatedly he incited the raucous crowd by making race-oriented comments then asking, “How black is that?”   Most outrageously, Foxx screeched that through his movie character, an escaped slave, Foxx was able to “…kill all the white people in the movie.  How GREAT is that and how black is that?” 

Was Chris Lane’s murder an example of socially-acceptable black-on-white racial hatred?  Of course not!  The LA Times heading rationalized that “Bored' Oklahoma teens randomly kill Australian student.”   Edwards and his two accomplices were simply “bored” so, naturally, they “randomly” killed Lane.

 

How does one randomly kill?  Since I never have been able to figure that one out, I listened to violence expert Dr. Chuck Williams, a Drexel University African American psychologist, who on August 23, 2013 discussed the Lane murder with Scott Brown, a stand-in host on “The O’Reilly Factor.”  At first, Williams proved mostly informed and informative.  He had “cred,” as they say on the street; cred that is until Brown quoted Williams’ aforementioned bigoted, murderous  remarks and then asked Williams if he believed that race played a significant role in Lane’s being gunned down.  InCREDibly, the good doctor said, “no.”

The Dr. Williams interview demonstrates once more that the conduct of racial discussions has little or nothing to do with the intelligence or academic credentials of participants.   In our country, racial discussions are not about objective facts; they are all about identity.   In matters of race, psychologists, other social scientists, media personnel and politicians are as conflicted; perhaps more conflicted, than the general population.  It is an identity-based white vs. black, us vs. them, concede nothing, win or lose irrational battle.  Especially when whites are racial victims and/or blacks are racial aggressors, racial double standards, double speak, and double binds take center stage. 

Until a violence expert/university professor readily can acknowledge on national television that 2 + 2 = 4, America never will be free from racial hatred and oppression, a two-sided hatred and oppression that are both white-on-black and black-on-white, one in which overt, physical violence against whites by blacks is a predominant feature.  Eighty-nine-year old Delbert Belton and 22-year-old Chris Lane soon will fade from the nation’s consciousness, only to be replaced by two more victims of unchallenged, pervasive, perverse anti-white racism.

Just More Black on White Violence. Nothing to Be Concerned About

In an August, 2013 preview of her interview on MSNBC, Oprah Winfrey commented about the George Zimmerman acquittal  saying, “It's so easy during this time: Trayvon Martin, Trayvon Martin parallel to Emmett Till, let me just tell you. In my mind, same thing.”   She, of course, was referring to the probable 1955 Mississippi murder of Till, a fourteen year old black boy, by the husband and half-brother of a twenty-one year old white woman.  According to a 1957 Look magazine article by William Bradford Huie:

Bobo Till, visiting his country cousins in the Delta in August, 1955, boasted of sexual relations with a Chicago white girl whose picture he carried. The local Negro youths, “just to show us how much you Chicago cats know about white girls,” dared Bobo to enter a crossroads store at night and ask Bryant’s young wife “for a date.” While the Delta Negroes peered, in delicious awe, through the front windows, Bobo took the dare; Carolyn Bryant chased him with a pistol and, in a gesture of adolescent bravado, Bobo “wolf-whistled” at her.

Early in the morning of August 28, 1955, Milam and Bryant abducted Bobo from his uncle’s farmhouse, intending to beat him and “chase him back to Chicago.” But instead of cowering, Bobo taunted them about his relations with a white girl, whereupon they took him to the Tallahatchie River, where Milam killed him with one bullet from an Army .45. They fastened a gin fan to his neck and threw him in.

Now I am no Oprah Winfrey, but to my feeble mind the Trayvon Martin case does not quite equate to the Bobo (Emmett) Till case. 

Whatever Till said to whomever, he did not deserve to be killed.  And his murder clearly was a racist atrocity by two depraved white men about 58 years ago: white on black violence.

Flash forward to 2013.  Where is the inter-racial violence today? FBI statistics indicate:

African -Americans commit 90% of the approximately 1,700,000 interracial crimes of violence that occur in the United States every year, and are more than 50 times more likely to commit violent crime against whites than vice versa.

You will never hear that statistic expressed in the American media or spoken by President Obama, Attorney General Eric Holder, Jesse (spit in your soup) Jackson, or Al (I got skinny) Sharpton.  No.  These and other anti-white raceketeers will avoid that discussion.  They will depend on media to obfuscate race as by referring to George Zimmerman as a “white Hispanic” to keep the racial pot boiling.  That same media would have referred to Zimmerman only as Hispanic had he won a Nobel Prize.  They might even have called him a Hispanic, Person-of-Color to promote non-white intellectual glory and to separate the non-white do-gooder from white America.

Interesting.  Does that mean that George Zimmerman is a “white Hispanic” because he has one white parent? Does that mean that Barack Obama is a “white black” president, since he too had one white parent?  No.  He is just “the first black president.”

The liberal press made a Barnum and Bailey Greatest Show on Earth production about the Trayvon Martin inter-racial case.  How about the vicious attack on a Florida white child by three black teens? When I Googled it, here is what I got from CBS news:

August 5, 2013 2:27 PM

Police in Gulfport, Fla. recently released surveillance video from a school bus that shows a 13-year-old student being attacked by three teens. The teens were charged with aggravated battery in the incident, and police announced Thursday the bus driver will not be charged for failing to intervene.

No mention of race here, only 47 matter-of-fact, coldly objective words.  When I dug further I found these statements in the August 5, 2013 Huffington Post : 

ABC Action News reports what, authorities said, lead to the fight:

Investigators determined that before the fight on the bus, the victim had encountered the one of the older boys inside a school restroom at Lealman Intermediate School.

The suspect tried to sell the victim drugs. The 13-year-old reported the suspect to school officials, but at the end of the day, the victim and the suspect ended up riding home on the same school bus.

Will the half-white President appear on television to say that the nameless 13-year-old white victim of inter-racial violence could have been Barack Obama’s half-son, and that the white victim was only doing what he has been told to do to resist the drug culture?   Will the President come out against the anti-snitching, black inner-city code of conduct that keeps law-abiding blacks huddled in their homes, knowing criminals have no fear of the police or the justice system?

In the following Christian Newswire report from April 27, 2007, Jesse Lee Peterson, a black reverend, spoke fearlessly about the roots of black inner-city violence:

 A CBS 60 Minutes segment aired this past Sunday reporting that the "stop snitchin'" campaign being promoted by some rappers in videos and on t-shirts is intimidating witnesses from coming forward to testify. According to law enforcement officials, this is causing crimes including murder to go unsolved in the inner cities. This epidemic has outraged social activist and author, Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson, who says that this twisted "code" has been passed down by criminals and by corrupt Black leaders who have been promoting an anti-police culture for the past 15-20 years.

"No one should be surprised that this 'stop snitchin'' campaign has a foothold in the Black community," said Rev. Peterson. "Black leaders like Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Rep. Maxine Waters, former NAACP head Ben Muhammad (formerly Ben Chavis), and Russell Simmons have encouraged anger and distrust towards police for years.

All of this leads me to conclude that a large American subculture suffers from a racial psychosis characterized by a total inability to acknowledge even the most obvious features of inter-racial violence when the features run counter to a “poor, oppressed black people” narrative.  Those so afflicted also exhibit an exquisitely paranoid, twisted reasoning process that enables them to project blame onto whites for any and all real or imagined inter-racial transgressions and to excuse any such transgressions by blacks.  In order to maintain their paranoid delusions, the racial psychotics direct their attention to past problems rather than to see current realities.  And they get away with and even are celebrated for their depravity.

Only in America.    

P. S.  Since I started with Ms. Winfrey, I can’t resist ending with her majesty who recently related a tale of personal racial victimization when being interviewed by Entertainment Tonight’s Nancy O'Dell. 

Allegedly, OW entered an ultra-chic Zurich boutique, Trois Pomme, where she inquired about a $38,000 handbag behind a counter.  When the salesperson, who did not recognize the sovereign, suggested that the bag was too expensive, Oprah left the store in a rapid “swagga.”  (I am sure that the salesperson never would have suggested to a white person that the bag might be too expensive.  I just wonder how many times a day someone insists on seeing the $38,000 bag.)   

Reflecting on the incident, Winfrey told O’Dell, "I could've had the whole blow-up thing and thrown down the black card, but why do that? But that clearly is, you know ... it (racism) still exists. Of course it does."   

Like Alice in Wonderland’s Red Queen, Oprah Winfrey also could have “turned crimson with fury, and, after glaring at her for a moment like a wild beast, screamed `Off with her head!  Off--'” but the queen of talk shows is too refined for such ranting.  Rather, Winfrey is just one more composed, garden variety race-obsessed American, and we can’t blame her for that.

Big Brother Obama and His “Progressive” Collaborators Are Not Just Watching Us

My friend, Clint, sent me the Fox news article partially reproduced below that I forwarded previously.

FoxNews.com

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/07/30/govt-knows-best-white-house-creates-nudge-squad-to-shape-behavior/#ixzz2aolrxkvd 

The federal government is hiring what it calls a "Behavioral Insights Team" that will look for ways to subtly influence people's behavior, according to a document describing the program obtained by FoxNews.com. Critics warn there could be unintended consequences to such policies, while supporters say the team could make government and society more efficient. While the program is still in its early stages, the document shows the White House is already working on such projects with almost a dozen federal departments and agencies including the Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Agriculture. "Behavioral sciences can be used to help design public policies that work better, cost less, and help people to achieve their goals," reads the government document describing the program, which goes on to call for applicants to apply for positions on the team.

The Fox article is new but the governmental strategy is old.  In my book I talked about how Obama and his gang use psychologists and psychological research to manipulate media and people.  Notice that the above referenced “government document” mentions that policies will be designed to “help people achieve their goals;” it should read, “help the Obama coalition achieve its goals.”

We relentlessly are bombarded by both overt and covert messages that promote a so-called progressive (i.e., liberal) agenda.   Much of the agenda is racialized, directed toward raising up the favored ones by stepping on the disfavored ones.  And it is no secret that Obama and his progressive collaborators do all they can to promote propaganda that juxtaposes smart “people of color’ with bumbling, fumbling, mumbling “white folk.”  The propaganda works so well and has insinuated itself so fully into media that most of us never even notice.   For instance, advertisers regularly contrast dumb, inept whites with clever, capable blacks.  Consider the Pennsylvania Lottery’s current promotion ( Here is the video link if you want to view it for yourself http://www.palottery.state.pa.us/About-PA-Lottery/TV-Commercials.aspx ) that shows an African American couple comfortably and contentedly sitting on the shore scratching off a Gold Rush lottery card while a white couple splash helplessly in a paddle boat, not only unable to direct the boat but also in danger of sinking it.  If the black couple had been the one depicted so foolishly, you definitely would have heard about it.    

I have no problem with humor.  We can use all that we can get.  But why promote propaganda that dichotomizes races as one positive versus one negative?   If a given “joke” requires intellect contrast, why not run the brainy versus buffoon ad with two black or with two white couples.  When black and white couples are shown in the same advertisements present them equally, both brainy or both buffoon.  (For a fuller discussion and more examples of racially divisive advertising and media you can check out my book, Barry Barack Hussein Soetoro Obama, Identity, and Racial Hypocrisy in America.)  

By using psychological insights such as the one I have just suggested, maybe Barack Obama and his progressive collaborators can employ their "Behavioral Insights Team" that will look for ways to subtly influence people's behavior in a non-racist, pro-American, pro-inclusive, egalitarian direction.  But then, that approach would not personally benefit our narcissistic, Machiavellian, psychopathic, race-obsessed premier—I mean president—would it?