I never told my wife. My
kids did not know. My lifelong friends
had no inkling. In fact, not until the
last several days did I accept the simple truth that I am biracial.
So how did I discern my dual racial heritage? As a typically race-naïve former white man, I
deferred to a putative race expert: Barack Obama, the guy who subtitled his
autobiography, A Story of Race and
Inheritance.
In the Obama book, I learned the necessary and sufficient elements
that determine racial identity. Barack
explained that he had a black father and a white mother. With impeccable logic and persuasive
narrative, he led me page by page through a narcissistically obsessive journey
to the inevitable conclusion that he is a black man. Like a veritable racial Einstein, through
painstaking inferential, deductive analysis, Barack had discovered the
counterintuitive fact that in order to be black a person need only have one
black parent—satisfying one-half of the racial criteria proves sufficient to
balance the entire racial identity equation.
Barack Obama’s insights started my feeble mind whirling, racially
introspecting like never before. As I
obsessed about the fact that I had a white father and a white mother, the
obvious finally hit me: I am biracial.
Why? Before Obama, I mistakenly
had presumed that a black person is one who had two black parents, as opposed
to a biracial person, like Barack, who had one black and one white parent.
After reading Obama, I know that in racial matters, half a parental
inheritance is as good as the whole thing.
The genetic formula goes something like this: I, Barack Obama, was born one black parent
short of the full black complement, but I choose to be black, not
biracial.
If Barack is black but only satisfies half the criteria for being
black, I am biracial for the same reason; that is, I satisfy half the parental
inheritance of a black and white biracial person: I was born one black parent
short of being biracial, and since half a racial inheritance is as good as the
whole inheritance, I choose to be biracial, not white.
Sound crazy. Sure is. Race in 21st Century America is
analogous to anti-Darwinism in the early 20th Century.
You probably recall something of the famous Scopes “Monkey” Trial
of 1925 during which Bryan, a rabid anti-evolutionist, squared off against
Clarence Darrow, a famous criminal defense lawyer. Bryan and Obama share several similarities:
Like Obama, Bryan was a gifted orator and a liberal, Progressive Democrat. Like Obama, Bryan “truly believed” in his
heart that he was right, and that was enough for him. Like Barack Obama, William Bryan ignored
biological and other scientific data inconveniently at odds with his beliefs;
his self-evident truth required no empirically supportive data. And like Barack, William promoted legislation
to force-feed his irrationality down the throats of the American people.
William Jennings Bryan could not imagine a God who used evolution
to enact his will. Bryan had framed
evolution as an either-or: religion versus biological science, humanity either
had resulted from an act of God or from a satanic naturalistic blunder. Either religion or science, nothing in
between; Darwin’s Theory was ipso facto blasphemy.
And so it is with Obama: either or, white or black with nothing in
between, no half-steps. As a 21st
Century William Jennings Bryan, Barack Hussein Obama approaches his racial
identity with evangelical fervor. Obama
wants to be black to fulfill the fanciful dreams that he believes he inherited
from his father. Only one inconvenient
complication: he is half white. How
troubling, to be bi-racial. His solution is to employ racially dichotomous
thinking, reasoning that since he is not all white, he must be all black.
By adhering to the half-is-whole rule, Barack silences his biracial
identity demons sufficiently to live out his heroic race-based fantasies. Moreover, he reinforces his racial delusion
and insufficient black credibility by seeking likeminded racial extremists who share his
identity-oriented delusional system.
Barack’s anti-biracial battle has been a life-long, consuming
preoccupation. To cite merely one
example, consider the following excerpt from Obama’s autobiography: “I ceased
to advertise my mother’s race at the age of twelve or thirteen, when I began to
suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites.”
Unfortunate for him, Barack Obama’s biracial hide and seek never has worked. He lives a life dogged by a pervasive national black identity neurosis. For instance, at the May 2009 White House Correspondents' Association dinner, African American comedian Wanda Sykes exclaims, "The first black president! I'm proud to be able to say that. That's unless you screw up. And then it's going to be, 'What's up with the half-white guy?'"
Unfortunate for him, Barack Obama’s biracial hide and seek never has worked. He lives a life dogged by a pervasive national black identity neurosis. For instance, at the May 2009 White House Correspondents' Association dinner, African American comedian Wanda Sykes exclaims, "The first black president! I'm proud to be able to say that. That's unless you screw up. And then it's going to be, 'What's up with the half-white guy?'"
To Sykes, mocking biracials is great sport. Other black identity slavemasters, however,
are deadly serious, such as those who excoriated Tiger Woods when he expressed
discomfort at being called black rather than the multi-racial person who he
is. The identity slavemasters mock and ostracize
non-conforming “mixed” persons, calling them Uncle Tom, Sell-out, or
Not-Black-Enough.
Biracial people, who consistently, unapologetically identify
themselves as such, literally embody our nation’s hope for real racial
reconciliation. Down to the cellular
level, they are living testaments to racial equality and harmony. They are not either-or. They are not half of anything. They simply are who they are, persons with a
black and white parent.
Our country needs a modern Clarence Darrow to take on President
Obama so as to dispel the either-or, half-is-whole racial identity standard and
to replace it with an attitude brave enough to celebrate the biological reality
of bi-racials and multi-racials. Even if
Clarence comes along, however, I do not expect a quick fix. Darrow did lose the Scopes Trial.
As one uniquely qualified to initiate and lead a national dialogue
about biracial identity, President Obama still has an opportunity to become an
All-American racial hero. In Navy
Seal-like fashion, he should conduct search and destroy missions to ferret out
and eliminate the double standards, double speak, and double binds that racial
terrorists employ daily to poison black-white interpersonal relations. Barack can initiate the assault by resolutely
and consistently proclaiming his self not black, not white, but black and
white. In order to do so, Obama first
would need to set aside his narcissistic, dreams-from-my father fantasies, a most improbable action.
So until Barack Hussein Obama and his racially divisive and
duplicitous supporters overcome their systemic racial hypocrisy, I will remain
one of the approximately 4,856,136 biracial and multi-racial Americans quietly
campaigning for justice. Do you think
that Eric Himpton Holder, Jr., our race-absorbed Attorney General, will find a
class-action biracial identity civil rights case worthy of federal
investigation?
No comments:
Post a Comment