In my last
blog, I wrote that the media’s favorite swaggering despot got a liberally
applied liberal media smack down for his drone strike policy. I showed that, for once, New York Times types
realize that the I-can do-no wrong Emperor has no clothes. As incredible as it seems, even they finally accept the inherent contradiction of celebrating Barack as a Nobel Peace
Prize laureate one year and recognizing him as Executioner-in-Chief the next.
Now, don’t get
me wrong. I’m fine with drone strikes, especially
when they snuff-out murderous radical Muslim terrorists. My complaint is with the President, not with
the military strategy. Once again, the
issue is one of his dark-triad personality. The narcissistically-preoccupied Barack Obama truly believes that he, and only he, is the best judge of
who to kill and when. He, no doubt,
would support that arrogant contention by referring to his decades-long experience
with military theory and practice, and to his supra-natural understanding of
morality and philosophy in matters of life and death.
Although Barack Hussein being subjected to New York Times censure is sweet, however, even
better is to see that the United Nations Human Rights Council also woke-up to
Obama. Courtesy of my friend, Don, who
sent me the information, below is the introduction to a Whiskey and Gunpowder
posting:
Obama sure loves killing people with his
drones.
GENEVA
(Reuters) - A U.N. investigator has called on the Obama administration to
justify its policy of assassinating rather than capturing al Qaeda or Taliban
suspects, increasingly with the use of unmanned drone aircraft that also take
civilian lives.
Christof
Heyns, U.N. special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary
executions, urged Washington to clarify the basis under international law of
the policy, in a report issued overnight to the United Nations Human Rights
Council. The 47-member Geneva forum is to hold a debate later on Tuesday.
United Nations Human
Rights Council … United Nations Human Rights Council … United Nations Human
Rights Council? When did I last hear
about that august group?
Damn ! I know where I heard about them. That's the group that the Obama Administration tried
to sic on the dastardly Republicans for trying to require voter
registration. That's the group that SuperBarack
Obaman, the first, invincible, black (really biracial) immigrant from Krypton, held in high
esteem as the arbiter of truth, justice, and the American, or perhaps international,
way. Eric Shawn of FoxNews.com wrote
about the issue on March 14, 2012:
UN rights council delves
into US voter I.D. laws
The
controversy over requiring voters to provide photo IDs has reached the world
stage.
The United
Nations Human Rights Council is investigating the issue of American election
laws at its gathering on minority rights in Geneva, Switzerland. This, despite
the fact that some members of the council have only in the past several years
allowed women to vote, and one member, Saudi Arabia, still bars women from the
voting booth completely.
So, the dark-triad,
double-speaking President who tried to use a sham United Nations organization
to attack voter registration laws, instead has become their target. Moreover, the Human Rights Council is not
merely investigating Obama for killing rather than capturing the terrorists. Rather, Zamir Akram alleges that “Thousands
of innocent people, including women and children, have been murdered in these
indiscriminate [drone] attacks."
Can you say “comeuppance
?”
No comments:
Post a Comment