Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Poetic Justice for Mr. O


In my last blog, I wrote that the media’s favorite swaggering despot got a liberally applied liberal media smack down for his drone strike policy.  I showed that, for once, New York Times types realize that the I-can do-no wrong Emperor has no clothes.  As incredible as it seems, even they finally accept the inherent contradiction of celebrating Barack as a Nobel Peace Prize laureate one year and recognizing him as Executioner-in-Chief the next.

Now, don’t get me wrong.  I’m fine with drone strikes, especially when they snuff-out murderous radical Muslim terrorists.  My complaint is with the President, not with the military strategy.  Once again, the issue is one of his dark-triad personality.  The narcissistically-preoccupied Barack Obama truly believes that he, and only he, is the best judge of who to kill and when.  He, no doubt, would support that arrogant contention by referring to his decades-long experience with military theory and practice, and to his supra-natural understanding of morality and philosophy in matters of life and death.

Although Barack Hussein being subjected to New York Times censure is sweet, however, even better is to see that the United Nations Human Rights Council also woke-up to Obama.  Courtesy of my friend, Don, who sent me the information, below is the introduction to a Whiskey and Gunpowder posting:

Obama sure loves killing people with his drones.
GENEVA (Reuters) - A U.N. investigator has called on the Obama administration to justify its policy of assassinating rather than capturing al Qaeda or Taliban suspects, increasingly with the use of unmanned drone aircraft that also take civilian lives.
Christof Heyns, U.N. special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, urged Washington to clarify the basis under international law of the policy, in a report issued overnight to the United Nations Human Rights Council. The 47-member Geneva forum is to hold a debate later on Tuesday.

United Nations Human Rights Council … United Nations Human Rights Council … United Nations Human Rights Council?  When did I last hear about that august group?

Damn !  I know where I heard about them.  That's the group that the Obama Administration tried to sic on the dastardly Republicans for trying to require voter registration.  That's the group that SuperBarack Obaman, the first, invincible, black (really biracial) immigrant from Krypton, held in high esteem as the arbiter of truth, justice, and the American, or perhaps international, way.  Eric Shawn of FoxNews.com wrote about the issue on March 14, 2012:
UN rights council delves into US voter I.D. laws
The controversy over requiring voters to provide photo IDs has reached the world stage.
The United Nations Human Rights Council is investigating the issue of American election laws at its gathering on minority rights in Geneva, Switzerland. This, despite the fact that some members of the council have only in the past several years allowed women to vote, and one member, Saudi Arabia, still bars women from the voting booth completely.

So, the dark-triad, double-speaking President who tried to use a sham United Nations organization to attack voter registration laws, instead has become their target.  Moreover, the Human Rights Council is not merely investigating Obama for killing rather than capturing the terrorists.  Rather, Zamir Akram alleges that “Thousands of innocent people, including women and children, have been murdered in these indiscriminate [drone] attacks."

Can you say “comeuppance ?” 

No comments:

Post a Comment