The Thought Police Are Back and They Are Watching You

The thought police know what white people are thinking.  They know that white people obsessively ruminate about race, race, race.  The thought police know because the thought police obsessively ruminate about race, race, race.

Brian Farnan, a white McGill University student, had his thoughts read by the thought police and they didn’t like what they read.  You see Brian had posted a humorous video of Barack Obama kicking open a door after giving a short speech.  The police knew that Farnan meant the video to reinforce a racist stereotype about black men and they were not going to let him get away with that race crime!  It made no difference to them that Brian Farnan had no history of racism or that the video clip came from the Jay Leno Show that always has been so favorably disposed toward Barack.  Taking their cue from Kim Jong-un, North Korean Supreme leader, the thought police forced the student to write the following public confession which was distributed to 22,000 McGill undergraduates:

“The image in question was an extension of the cultural, historical and living legacy surrounding people of colour — particularly young men — being portrayed as violent in contemporary culture and media.”

Brian Farnan’s crime is what some psychologists, themselves racially biased, call “racial micro-aggression” and about which I briefly wrote here in a previous blog and, more extensively, in my book.  The racial micro-aggression concept has non-psychologist race keepers giddy with excitement and intoxicated with power since now they can refer to “scientific data” to legitimize their anti-white crusade and to solicit government funding for it.  Here I quote myself about the scientific basis for the concept:       

The “data” of racial micro-aggressions actually are purely subjective opinions determined by persons with a vested, determined interest in making a social point, namely that white people are responsible for the ills of all other peoples on earth.  If a white person hesitates, glances away, or cuts short an interaction with a non-white, that white person is guilty of micro-aggression racism.  The methods of racial micro-aggression studies always involve alleged victimization only of non-whites.  I literally never have seen one study that investigates the possibility of racial micro-aggressions against white people.  In fact, I have never found a single APA study that has addressed anti-white racism as a subject in and of itself.  It is as if no “person of color” ever has harbored racist feelings or performed racist actions against whites.

If you are white then, please look deep within your soul and consider whether you ever have hesitated, glanced away, or cut short an interaction with a non-white person.  In the event that you have, please seek redemption.  To make that easy, I suggest that you merely use Brian Farnan’s McGill University certified statement as a template to create a personalized version.  They say—the thought police—that confession is good for the soul.  So, write your confession and post it in some public space, preferable on the internet.  If you do, you will have exorcized at least one of your white devils and helped increase your chance for eternal salvation.