Remember
the “good old days” when racism was comprehensible. You know, a time when
white people demeaned black people and black people demeaned white ones.
That was the kind of bias that had been normative across the world since time
immemorial. Everyone—white, black, and all shades in between— “naturally”
favored their own group, regarding their own people as superior to all the
rest.
Although
racism always has been abhorrent on its face, in the past racial prejudice at
least tended to strengthen affiliations within each racial group; racism was
“honest,” loosely speaking. In 21st Century America,
however, racist talk is mostly disingenuous manipulation intended to raise the
profile of the racist speaker and to achieve his ends. Racism always has
been stupid, but contemporary racism takes stupidity to a whole new level.
Enter Harry
Reid who on July 9, 2014 when speaking to reporters about the Supreme Court’s
Hobby Lobby decision said, “The one thing we are going to do during this
work period, sooner rather than later, is to ensure that women’s lives are not
determine by virtue of five white [emphasis added] men.”
What did
race have to do with the Holly Hobby decision? Answer: nothing.
So why
did Harry Reid interject race into his comments? Because he was
polita-speaking—double speak gerrymandering the boundaries of rationality and
language to provide a sound bite intended to rally Democrats for the November
2014 election. And nothing rallies the Democrat electorate or legislators
as well as race baiting does.
As in
this case, polita-speak makes both speakers and listeners crazy, so crazy that
Harry Reid forgot that one of the five male Supreme Court Justices—Clarence
Thomas—is black. You probably know that Thomas is a black man that no
race mongering white or black ever forgets. Justice Thomas is a number
one target for racial slurs, most coming from black racial identity
slavemasters who “Uncle Tom” him because they simply cannot tolerate an African
American who doesn’t think, speak, and behave according to their racial
orthodoxy norms.
Moreover,
it was not Harry Reid’s first race-oriented public relations snafu.
Recall that on January 8, 2010 Reid “confessed” that during the 2008
presidential election he had referred to Barack Obama as “light skinned … with
no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one." The admission
occurred because Reid’s comments were contained in the Mark Halperin and John
Heilemann book Game Change that was being released the next
week. As expected, Reid called Barack and apologized profusely for his
“poor choice of words.” In another comical, unconsciously
determined slip of the tongue, Obama responded by releasing a White House
statement that said, “As far as I am concerned, the book [emphasis added] is
closed."
Regarding
Reid's reference to “white men,” the term rarely is objectively descriptive in
the so-called liberal progressive lexicon. Rather, to Harry Reid and
other progressives, “white men” is its own racial slur that they use mostly in
polemic, political tirades. The only greater progressive slur would be “OLD
white men,” but that is an issue for another blog posting.
The fact
that Reid forgot that Justice Clarence Thomas is black illustrates that the
good senator was operating on auto-think with gobbledygook flowing effortlessly
from his vacuous mind. It is noteworthy that Harry Reid, himself,
actually is an elderly white man, presumably a self-hating, quasi-delusional
one.
In
America, demeaning remarks against white males are so hard-wired, so automatic
a feature of political manipulation, that the demagogues—white and
black—literally don’t even know what they are speaking about when they speak.
No comments:
Post a Comment