Virtually everyone is familiar with homeostasis. To
refresh that concept: it refers to the fact that a healthful physical condition
must be maintained within a narrow range regardless of the external environment
wherein we find ourselves. Among the many processes to
be maintained are those such as temperature control, pH balance, and glucose
levels.
Not so widely known, however, is the allostasis
concept—the process by which the body regains homeostasis when homeostasis is
challenged or lost due to stress. Some of the stressors are purely
physical, such as frigid weather and some are less so, such as angry
disputes. Most stressors, of course, include an amalgam of physical and
non-physical stress (e.g., mental) in various combinations. Unlike
homeostasis, allostasis operates by ANTICIPATING increased bodily demands and
challenges. For instance, allostasis begins to operate long before your
body temperature has deteriorated to a critical, life-threatening level.
ALLOSTATIC LOAD is defined as the bodily wear and tear (e.g., heart
disease) due to chronic stressors whether more physical, more mental or a
combination of both.
To a considerable extent, our health and happiness depend on
how we manage our physical and non-physical allostatic load, and the
management often is very difficult. We have an improved chance of
succeeding if we augment the automatic, unconsciously directed allostatic physical anticipation with a consciously
directed allostatic mental
anticipation. Ideally, we must develop the habit of anticipating stressors
before they occur, or at the very start of their deleterious action.
Because physical homeostasis and physical allostasis are automatic, we rarely think about their functioning. So, we are unlikely to attempt to predict
their failure, and we do not feel responsible when they do fail. By contrast, we can exert a modicum of both
mental homeostasis and mental allostasis stress influence by the manner through
our by employing stress anticipation. Sometimes that stress anticipation enables us
to forgo or mitigate stress, and sometimes it causes us to instigate or accentuate
stress. In the latter case, we increase
our stress and allostatic load only eventually to discover that the anticipated
stressor never materializes.
One common cause of mental stress and its mental allostatic load is our mistakenly using affect (emotion) as
information (Schwar, & Clore, 1983). But unlike the just-cited authors, I must replace
their use of the generic word “information”
to my phrase, OBJECTIVE DISPASSIONATE VALID
INFORMATION. I do so because affect is information that , at
minimum, is a highly personal, sometimes idiosyncratic, emotional information
signal, causing us to predict that something noteworthy might, will, or soon
will occur.
The major issue, of course, involves what one does with the affective
information signal that is received. Try
transforming an uncontrollable, affective
information signal into controllable, objective
dispassionate valid information by asking yourself questions such as the following:
Am I about to improperly use my CURRENT emotional state as a
heuristic or shortcut when making judgments or decisions. For example, if I am
feeling poorly right now, will I
evaluate a situation more negatively than is warranted, or vice versa?
Am I about to attribute my current feelings to the wrong
source and make an unwarranted decision?
Might my present affect be more current context-dependent
than I realize, causing me to make a
decision now that harms my long -term well-being?
Conversely, could my present affect prompt me to overestimate
the impact of my current decision on future events that will deleteriously influence
my emotional well-being?
The bottom line of all this is to say that we should
mindfully think about all our homeostatic and allostatic circumstances in order
to reduce our stressors or, at least, to better cope with them. However, since we have relatively greater
control over our mental homeostasis and mentally-induced allostatic load, that
should be our central concern. Moreover,
given that the social environment usually is our most common and intense form
of encountered stress (Almeida, 2005), we should strive to maximize our
salutary interpersonal relationships and minimize our negative ones.
REFERENCES
Almeida, D. M.
(2005). Resilience and Vulnerability to Daily
Stressors Assessed via Diary Methods
Current
directions in psychological science, Volume 14, Issue 2. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00336.x
Schwarz, N. & Clore, G. (1983). Mood, misattribution,
and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective
states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(3), 513-523.
doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.513
No comments:
Post a Comment