Barack Vladimir Putin Obama: To Change America

Recall the infamous March 26, 2012 “open-mike” clandestine muttering in Seoul, South Korea, between President Barack Obama and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev as they meet to discuss critical, sensitive U.S.-Russian relations.

Obama: On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this, this can be solved but it’s important for him to give me space.

Medvedev: Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…

Obama: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.

Medvedev: I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir.

Barack without a teleprompter.  Barack just being Barack, the real Barack, a man who, like Vladimir, regards elections as a hindrance to his unfettered power exploitation. 

Over and over again Obama reveals himself megalomaniacally determined not just to execute the laws but to “execute’ our system of governance.  He wants to change the system by fiat, now and forever by personally deciding just how America should operate.  Obama chooses, either directly or through his surrogates, to ignore laws objectionable to him.  For instance, he avoids enforcing laws regarding immigration and voter intimidation when the latter involved New Black Panther Party threats toward white voters in Philadelphia.

His actions are not limited to dealing with a given issue or issues but strike at the very heart of our systems of government.  Of all his dictatorial actions, however, none is more detrimental to our nation than his attacks on our electoral processes.  For instance, Obama is determined to have criminals and illegal aliens vote because they will be eternally grateful not only for the vote but also for the political handouts so “liberally” dispensed by “progressive Democrats.”

Obama values Machiavellian manipulations of the electoral process because he realized early on that his very election depended on manipulations: 

The Washington Post, June 20 2008:

In February 2007, Barack Obama challenged Republican presidential candidates to agree to public financing of the general election. John McCain responded positively, prompting Obama's campaign spokesman, Bill Burton, to call on other Republican candidates to follow suit. The headline in the New York Times: "McCain and Obama in Deal on Public Financing."

June 20, 2008, the New York Times:

With his decision, Mr. Obama became the first candidate of a major party to decline public financing — and the spending limits that go with it — since the system was created in 1976, after the Watergate scandals.

Why the change?  Because Barack Obama realized that he could buy the election through private “He will be our first African American President” pander donations, and buying the election was far more important to him than was supporting the electoral process. 

Now that Obama has had his “last election,” has “more flexibility” and need not worry about bothersome election finance laws, he is ready for “change we can believe in.”   More specifically, he has decided to work his imperial governmental manipulations by surrogate fiat, namely, through having the Treasury Department and IRS try to decide who can donate how much to whom.   The Washington Post (November 26, 2013) notes that “501(c)4 groups that were potentially engaging in too much election-related activity” and “The ability of such organizations to play in politics without revealing their donors has been decried by President Obama and other critics as a major loophole in the campaign finance system.”  

Even the super-liberal Mark Shields has been moved to comment on Barack Obama’s role in the demise of the electoral process.  On the November 29, 2013 PBS Newshour he said:

We had 32 years, from 1976 to 2008, in which we had elections.  As somebody who spent his early year in politics, before I turned to journalism, by default, I can tell you, they were clean. Ronald Reagan three times ran for president. He accepted the limits on contributions, the limits on what you could spend, and he ran on public financing in the fall elections, when he won 49 states one time and 44 the next, George H.W. Bush twice, Bill Clinton twice, George W. Bush.

And it changed in 2008. President Obama was the first president not to abide by the limits in the general election. And then along comes the Citizens United case decision at the Supreme Court, which took off all limits on spending.    

  

So Barack, you can call me Vladimir, Obama plays free and easy with the electoral system and gets elected twice.  Now he’s through with elections and wants to make them “clean.”   This is a man with no integrity, no shame, and no concern for anyone or anything other than what he wants.  If anyone has earned the epithet “dark triad personality” with Machiavellian, psychopathic, and narcissistic features it surely is Barack Hussein Obama.