Race Talk in America: Pathologically Biased to the Core

By now many Americans have heard of the “knock-out game” in which blacks coldcock unsuspecting white passersby whom they see on the street.  Given that black-on-white aggression usually is attributed to “random” acts of violence, as opposed to white-on-black aggression that always is dubbed “vicious racist attacks” maybe we can double speak the events to call them “random acts of black violence against white people.”  Noteworthy is that in New York City white victims mostly have been Jews, the whites with a sterling history of black advocacy, the whites who literally helped to establish the NAACP in the early 1900s.   

With the above in mind, let’s direct our attention to the On the Record show hosted by Greta Van Susteren during which she interviewed New York State Assemblyman Dov Hikind, a Jew, who expressed profound concern about the vicious black-on-white assaults.  He spoke personally about his new habit of repeatedly, nervously glancing around when he walks the streets of Brooklyn.

Van Susteren: This has been going on across the country. But I'm curious, is it -- is it targeting Jewish citizens in New York? Do you have there's a specific target? Is anything said as the attackers attack? I take it there's no robbery involved. Is there anything to suggest this is a specific target?

Hikind: In almost all the cases nothing is said. Nothing is taken. It so happens that literally almost every single victim in New York has been Jewish and almost every single perpetrator has been black. It's not my job to say is it racial or not. At this point, it hardly matters.

Is it not Mr. Hikind’s job to say whether it is racial or not, and does it hardly matter?   

Mr. Hikind is a Democrat and no doubt aware of the oft-quoted John F. Kennedy remark, “All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing” (that Kennedy incorrectly attributed to British philosopher Edmund Burke).  To my way of thinking, all that is necessary for racial evil to triumph is for good men to censor their racially-oriented thoughts and comments to the extent that they are incapable of stating that which is racially obvious.  Or, to paraphrase George Orwell, “Freedom is the freedom to say that when ‘almost every single racial victim’ is white and ‘almost every single perpetrator has been black,’ black racists are to blame.”

In my book, Barry Barack Hussein Suitor Obama : Identity and Racial Hypocrisy in America, I asserted that it is racial double standards, double speak, and double binds that lie at the heart of our country’s racial torment.  If a Jewish assemblyman, renowned for his battles against antisemitism, cannot call racism racism, then who can?

To my way of thinking, racial excuse-making causes more problems that it attempts to heal.  Anyone with an ounce of common sense sees right through the racial hypocrisy promulgated by the government and the media.  The double speak kindles simmering racial resentment that broadens and deepens the racial divide. When citizens’ just issues are dismissed or minimized, they become more recalcitrant and more intense in their opposition to force-fed, politically-inspired racial propaganda.