For purposes of this posting, let’s presume that most people
prefer to be liked, accepted, or, at least, tolerated. That begs the question,
“By whom?” Who is the person or persons
who determine your worth?: family? friends? neighbors? co-workers? Do you believe that all the valued ones want
to see the same attitudes and behaviors from you? When their expectations conflict, which, if
any, members of the multitude exert the greatest influence?
Where are you, yourself, in the “how to be” equation? When you realize that someone or some group expects
you to exhibit a particular attitude or behavior, do you start with them or
start with you? What parameters do you
apply when attempting to reach your conclusion? Equally important, what parameters do you ultimately
apply when acting upon your decision? If
your decision and/ or action is contrary to expectations of valued others, do
you explicitly address the discrepancy or not?
Of course, you rightly can reply that your decision and/or
action “depend” on specifics of the situation.
True, but, in that case, you would do well to understand what contextual
features are determinative for you and when.
Focusing on others vs. on oneself has many potential
implications. Here we only consider influences on our self-regulation (how we
manage our feelings and self-esteem) and our motivation as reported by Diel,
Grelle, and Hofmann (2021). The study
included 5400 subjects who were presented with everyday scenarios that required
them to compare their personal standards with others’ standards. Would they make their decisions primarily by
looking within themselves or by looking to others?
The answers depended on the value they ascribed to how they
perceived self-others discrepancies. One group of subjects engaged in “upward
comparison” by which they saw others’ standards as “better” than their
own. Many of these persons pushed
themselves to reach that higher standard of others but some did not. The latter had made extreme demands of
themselves and soon gave up when failing to achieve their unreachable goals. Failure within that group was all the more
disappointing for a subgroup who perceived that they had strong personal
control within the presented situation or when they strongly valued that
situation.
Another group of subjects engaged in “downward comparison”
by which they saw their own standards as “better” than those of others. Such people were generally more content with
their performance in the presented situation than were the upward comparison
group. On the other hand, the downward
comparers put forth less effort in attempting to satisfy the expected
standards.
So, what might this mean for you? How much of your self-regulation and
motivation are strongly or primarily determined by what you believe others
prefer or by what you independently prefer? But before you answer those questions,
consider an issue that I have saved for last.
Maybe in addition to, or in lieu of, family, friends, neighbors, and
co-workers, there are “remote” others that strongly influence your self-regulation
and motivation. For instance, do so-called
identity leaders that reach you via media—for example, celebrities,
politicians, and “tribal” group trendsetters—exert such powerful effects that
you want to believe and act in ways consistent with them?
Important, too, is the possibility that identity leader
influences steer you so automatically and unconsciously that you do not even
personally consider what they are presenting, but rather, you mindlessly adopt
their positions without personal reservation or deliberation. You might also upwardly or downwardly compare yourself
to the identity leaders with negative implications for your self-regulation
and/or motivation.
In sum then, be on guard against mindlessly, uncritically
allowing your attitudes and/or behaviors to be altered by family, friends, neighbors,
and co-workers whose knowledge in any given area is no more informed than
yours. And be exponentially more guarded
when uninformed and/or agenda-driven identity leaders try to sway you toward
their positions.
Reference
Diel, K., Grelle, S., & Hofmann, W. (2021). A motivational framework of social comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(6), 1415–1430. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000204
No comments:
Post a Comment